ETHICS

Ethics - William-Adolphe Bouguereau Little Thief

William-Adolphe Bouguereau Little Thief


This site is best viewed with a full screen (F11).

Copyright©2009-2013 by Larry Neal Gowdy.

All rights reserved.

All graphics on this website are public domain.


Please visit the home page for articles
that might not be listed here.




EthicsMorals.com Home

Ethics - the Problem

Ethics - the Solution

Applied Ethics

Aristotelian Ethics

Atheist Ethics

Buddhist Ethics

Christian Ethics

Hedonist Ethics

Hindu Ethics

Islamic Ethics

Metaethics

Normative Ethics

Objectivist Ethics

Utilitarian Ethics

Virtue Ethics



Contact Larry Gowdy
thelogics.org
WebsiteDesigningAmarillo.com


Normative Ethics

Updated October 15,2013



"The thief and the murderer follow nature just as much as the philanthropist" - Thomas Henry Huxley



A brief definition of Normative Ethics: "A classification within western philosophy that attempts to derive its standard of right and wrong from subjectively interpreted social behavior."

The three main categories of ethics within western philosophy are (1) Applied Ethics, (2) Metaethics, and (3) Normative Ethics. Applied Ethics proposes that right and wrong can be found within scenarios, Metaethics searches for the origins or causes of right and wrong, and Normative Ethics believes that right and wrong are found in an individual's behavior.

Examples of behaviors that are judged as right or wrong in Normative Ethics are honesty, lying, and stealing. The behaviors being judged by Normative Ethics are actions that have already occurred and are then being interpreted by the observer to be "honesty," "lying," or others. It is a weakness within the human manner of circular thought to (1) observe the result of an action, (2) to then place a name upon the end-product, and (3) to then believe that the end-product is a singularity that is self-defined by the name given to the action.

An analogy is that of a rock falling to the ground. The rock remains a rock regardless of its location, speed, or relative motion. The term "fall" implies that the rock is traveling from an upwards location to a lower location. However, if the observer were upside-down, he might interpret the rock's motion as flying upwards, and if another observer were traveling parallel to the rock, he might interpret the rock as motionless. The term "fall" is useful in the general sense that most humans would interpret the rock's motions relative to the humans' own speed and location, but never does a rock "fall," and never can a rock be judged by a philosophy of Normative Falling. (Also see IQ Questions and Answers - Types A and B Intelligences.)

To determine if a thing is honest, then there must be reasons why the thing is termed "honest," but just as "falling" cannot judge an interpretation of the laws of Nature that cause a rock's motion (speed, mass, kinetics, relativity, etc.), never can the term "honesty" define the laws of Nature that create honesty. Western philosophy's Metaethics attempts to discover the nature behind honesty, but Normative Ethics believes that the named interpretation of an action is sufficient enough to know the nature of - and the natural laws behind - the action itself.

As all rocks are composed of the components that combine to create the conceptual thing called a rock, so is honesty composed of components that combine to create the concept of honesty. Two of the numerous components that combine to create honesty are (1) accuracy of information and (2) personal intention. As all other things in the universe, honesty is a concept, not a solid object, nor is honesty a thing in itself, but rather honesty is a term given to the product of the numerous components that combine in a specific sequence to create what is defined as honesty.

If a man is honest, then his act of honesty is deemed to be of a positive nature, one that is commonly thought to be ethical, but if a man chooses inaccuracy of speech during his being interrogated by an enemy during a time of war, then the man's dishonesty - with the purpose of saving his comrade's lives - can also be interpreted as ethical. Regardless of whether the man's act of honesty or dishonesty might be classified under the title of ethics, the important thing to recognize is that honesty is a created thing, and never can the created thing become the rule, law, or standard of that which created the thing, and thus, never can Normative Ethics' manner of inquiry accurately conclude what might be right or wrong in a man's behavior.

To summarize, Normative Ethics attempts to discover the standards of right and wrong within the end-products of things like honesty, and not within the origins of the natural laws that dictate what is right and wrong. The difficulty of discovering the meaning of ethics, that western philosophy has suffered with for over three-thousand years, is in part due to Normative Ethics attempting to define laws and standards not by looking for the Natural laws and standards, but by looking at end-products while believing that the created things had no origin in Nature.